TechnologiesCSS Frameworks
English
CatalàČeskyDeutschEnglishEspañolفارسیFrançaisGalegoHindiItalianoPortuguêsРусскийУкраїнськаSvenskaTürkçeIndonesia简体中文正體中文日本語Polski한국어Romanian
Completion percentage: 78%
Completion percentage: 78%
Completion percentage: 44%
Completion percentage: 44%
Completion percentage: 58%
Completion percentage: 58%
Completion percentage: 82%
Completion percentage: 82%
Completion percentage: 18%
Completion percentage: 18%
Completion percentage: 67%
Completion percentage: 67%
Completion percentage: 82%
Completion percentage: 82%
Completion percentage: 16%
Completion percentage: 16%
Completion percentage: 42%
Completion percentage: 42%
Completion percentage: 38%
Completion percentage: 38%
Completion percentage: 86%
Completion percentage: 86%
Completion percentage: 81%
Completion percentage: 81%
Completion percentage: 35%
Completion percentage: 35%
Completion percentage: 64%
Completion percentage: 64%
Completion percentage: 37%
Completion percentage: 37%
Completion percentage: 75%
Completion percentage: 75%
Completion percentage: 72%
Completion percentage: 72%
Completion percentage: 71%
Completion percentage: 71%
Completion percentage: 72%
Completion percentage: 72%
Completion percentage: 77%
Completion percentage: 77%
Completion percentage: 79%
Completion percentage: 79%
Pre-/Post-processors
Utilities that augment CSS.
SatisfactionS
InterestI
UsageU
AwarenessA
Satisfaction, interest, usage, and awareness ratio rankings.
Technologies with less than 10% awareness not included. Each ratio is defined as follows:
- Satisfaction: would use again / (would use again + would not use again)
- Interest: want to learn / (want to learn + not interested)
- Usage: (would use again + would not use again) / total
- Awareness: (total - never heard) / total
Experience Over Time
Export
Percents%
CountΣ
Overview of opinions on the technologies surveyed over time.
| Would not use | |
| Not interested | |
| Would use again | |
| Interested | |
| Never heard |
Technologies with only one year of data are not included.
Positive/Negative Split
Export
This chart splits positive (“want to learn”, “would use again”) vs negative (“not interested”, “would not use again”) experiences on both sides of a central axis.
Bar thickness represents the number of respondents aware of a technology.
SassCompletion percentage: 82.1% (9440)Completion percentage: 82.1% (9440)
Completion percentage: 82.1% (9440)
Completion percentage: 82.1% (9440)
Export
Percents%
CountΣ
2019
2020
| Would not use | |
| Not interested | |
| Would use again | |
| Interested | |
| Never heard |
LessCompletion percentage: 82.3% (9454)Completion percentage: 82.3% (9454)
Completion percentage: 82.3% (9454)
Completion percentage: 82.3% (9454)
Export
Percents%
CountΣ
2019
2020
| Would not use | |
| Not interested | |
| Would use again | |
| Interested | |
| Never heard |
PostCSSCompletion percentage: 82.3% (9454)Completion percentage: 82.3% (9454)
Completion percentage: 82.3% (9454)
Completion percentage: 82.3% (9454)
Export
Percents%
CountΣ
2019
2020
| Would not use | |
| Not interested | |
| Would use again | |
| Interested | |
| Never heard |
StylusCompletion percentage: 82.2% (9442)Completion percentage: 82.2% (9442)
Completion percentage: 82.2% (9442)
Completion percentage: 82.2% (9442)
Export
Percents%
CountΣ
2019
2020
| Would not use | |
| Not interested | |
| Would use again | |
| Interested | |
| Never heard |
Other ToolsCompletion percentage: 3.4% (394)Completion percentage: 3.4% (394)
Completion percentage: 3.4% (394)
Completion percentage: 3.4% (394)
Export
Percents%
CountΣ
Other tools in this category (freeform answers).
Overall Happiness
Export
Percents%
CountΣ
On a scale of one (very unhappy) to five (very happy), how happy are developers with the current overall state of this category?
Recommended Resources
Sass Fundamentals
Leverage the Sass preprocessing to empower your CSS practices and master styling complex applications.
Thanks to our partners for supporting us! Learn more.